Improving Repository Security & Vulnerability Immunity

Secure repositories mean reliable releases. By embedding automated security and compliance checks directly into your CI/CD pipelines, you can prevent vulnerabilities, leaks, and build inconsistencies before they ever reach production. In this post, I'll show how to achieve repository immunity using Jenkins; integrating CVE scanning, static and dynamic analysis, and AI-assisted reviews into a single, maintainable workflow.

Read on to learn how to turn your repositories into self-defending systems that safeguard every commit.

Order code debugging and profiling services →

Introduction

• Why repository security matters
• Risks from internal & external code (open source, in-house)
• Goal: build immunity into Jenkins pipelines

Why Repository Security Matters

Modern software development relies heavily on source code repositories as the central place for collaboration, integration, and delivery. These repositories are not just storage for code — they contain:

• Core business logic that defines your product.
• Sensitive configuration files that may accidentally expose credentials, API keys, or internal endpoints.
• Open-source dependencies that can introduce vulnerabilities if not managed.

A compromised repository can lead to:

• Leakage of intellectual property.
• Exposure of credentials leading to infrastructure compromise.
• Introduction of malicious code (e.g., through a supply chain attack).
• Increased attack surface due to unpatched vulnerabilities.

Repository security is, therefore, one of the key pillars of software resilience.

Risks From Internal & External Code

Repositories typically contain a mix of code from different origins:

• Internal code (in-house development):
  • May contain shortcuts, weak coding practices, or leftover debug credentials.
  • Can lack consistent reviews and security validation if pipelines are not enforced.
• External code (open-source libraries & dependencies):
  • Dependencies often come with known CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures).
  • Attackers may deliberately inject malicious code into popular libraries (“supply chain attack”).
  • Licenses might impose restrictions or risks (e.g., GPL vs MIT vs proprietary).

Both internal and external sources can become the weakest link if not monitored.

Goal: Build Immunity Into Jenkins Pipelines

Rather than relying only on developers or manual reviews, security should be automated and integrated into the CI/CD process. Jenkins pipelines are an ideal place to enforce this.

The goal is to achieve:

• Continuous Verification – every commit and pull request is checked for vulnerabilities, secrets, and compliance.
• Defense in Depth – multiple layers of checks (static analysis, dependency scanning, runtime checks, AI-assisted review).
• Shift-Left Security – catching vulnerabilities early in the development cycle, reducing cost and risk.
• Consistent Standards – ensuring that all repositories (C++, Python, config files, build files) follow the same security and quality rules.

Dependency Vulnerability Scanning (CVE Checks)

Why Dependency Scanning Is Critical

Most modern applications are not built from scratch — they rely heavily on third-party and open-source components.

• In C++ projects, dependencies may come from packman, premake, or bazel build files.
• In Python projects, dependencies are usually specified in requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, or Pipfile.

While these components accelerate development, they also introduce security risks:

• Known CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures): Attackers actively exploit vulnerabilities in popular libraries.
• Supply chain attacks: Malicious updates or typo squatting packages can inject harmful code.
• Unmaintained libraries: Old versions may no longer receive security patches.

Without automated scanning, vulnerable dependencies can slip into production unnoticed.

Tools for Dependency Scanning

Below are commonly used tools for CVE and dependency scanning. Each integrates well into CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins:

• BlackDuck SCA
  • Own vulnerabilities issues similar to CVE (Black Duck Documentation Portal)
  • Useful for CVE issues reports and software BOM reports
• OSS Index / Sonatype
  • Free vulnerability database for open-source libraries.
  • Can be used with CLI tools (e.g., nancy, auditjs).
  • Good choice for initial integration with minimal setup.
• OWASP Dependency-Check
  • Open-source tool for scanning dependencies against the National Vulnerability Database (NVD).
  • Supports many ecosystems, including Python, Java, and C/C++.
  • Generates detailed HTML/JSON reports.
• Snyk
  • Commercial tool with strong open-source support.
  • Provides continuous monitoring and fix suggestions.
  • Can integrate with Git repositories, Docker images, and CI pipelines.
• Trivy
  • Lightweight scanner for containers and file systems.
  • Detects CVEs in OS packages and application dependencies.
  • Useful if your software is containerized or distributed in Docker images.
• Grype
  • CLI vulnerability scanner for container images and file systems.
  • Easy to use and script within Jenkins pipelines.
  • Pairs well with Syft for generating SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials).

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

To ensure that every commit and build is scanned for vulnerabilities, integrate dependency scanning directly after dependency resolution:

• Where to integrate:
  • For C++ projects: after packman/premake/bazel dependency resolution.
  • For Python projects: after pip install -r requirements.txt or equivalent.
• How to integrate:
  • Add a Jenkins pipeline stage (e.g., stage('Dependency Scanning')).
  • Run the scanner CLI (e.g., dependency-check.sh, trivy fs ., snyk test).
  • Parse results into Jenkins reports (HTML, JSON).
  • Fail the build if critical/high vulnerabilities are found.
• Best practices:
  • Store results for auditing (artifacts in Jenkins).
  • Run scans periodically (even if no code changes) to catch newly disclosed CVEs.
  • Consider generating an SBOM for compliance and long-term tracking.

Secret & Password Scanning

Why Secret Scanning Is Important

One of the most common (and dangerous) mistakes in software development is accidentally committing credentials into repositories. These can include:

• API keys and tokens (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, GitHub, GitLab, etc.)
• Database usernames and passwords
• SSH private keys
• TLS/SSL certificates
• Internal service credentials (e.g., Jenkins admin passwords, custom APIs)

Even if removed later, secrets remain in git history and can be exploited if the repository is cloned or leaked. Attackers often scan public repos (and even internal repos) for exposed secrets.

A single leaked credential can allow:

• Unauthorized access to production systems.
• Data breaches or service downtime.
• Lateral movement to other infrastructure.

Tools for Secret & Password Scanning

• GitLeaks
  • Actively maintained and widely used.
  • Supports scanning entire repositories, commits, and branches.
  • Provides customizable regex rules for organization-specific secrets.
• TruffleHog
  • Scans git history and branches for both high-entropy strings and regex-based secrets.
  • Can detect secrets not only in the latest code but also in commit history.
• detect-secrets (Yelp)
  • Lightweight tool with a focus on false-positive reduction.
  • Supports baseline files to ignore known test credentials.
  • Good for integration as a pre-commit hook.
• GitHub Secret Scanning
  • Built into GitHub (if code is mirrored there).
  • Automatically scans pushes for over 200 secret types.
  • Can notify the secret issuer (e.g., AWS, Azure) for immediate revocation.

Integration Into Development Workflow

Pre-commit hooks (developer side):

• Install secret scanning tools (e.g., detect-secrets or GitLeaks) as git hooks.
• Run scans locally before commits are pushed.
• Prevents secrets from ever leaving the developer’s machine.

Example:

1 pre-commit install
2 pre-commit run detect-secrets --all-files

Jenkins pipeline integration (CI side):

• Add a dedicated stage for secret scanning.
• Run tools like gitleaks detect --source . --report-path=gitleaks.json.
• Fail the build if secrets are found.
• Store reports as Jenkins artifacts for auditing.

Policy enforcement:

• Forbid commits containing hardcoded credentials.
• Use environment variables, secret managers (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Kubernetes Secrets) instead.

Best Practices

• Rotate all secrets regularly.
• Ensure removed secrets are revoked, not just deleted from source.
• Maintain an allowlist/baseline for false positives (e.g., test keys).
• Run scans on every PR/MR and periodically across the entire repo history.

Static Code Analysis

Why Static Analysis Matters

Static code analysis is the process of examining source code without executing it. The main benefits are:

• Detecting bugs and vulnerabilities early in the development cycle.
• Enforcing coding standards (naming, formatting, complexity).
• Identifying memory safety issues in C++ before runtime.
• Detecting common security risks (e.g., insecure function calls, SQL injection patterns).
• Providing consistent quality checks across the team.

Static analysis reduces the cost of fixing defects by shifting detection “left” — finding issues as code is written, not in production.

Tools for C++ Analysis

• Cppcheck
  • Open-source tool focusing on bug detection and coding style.
  • Detects memory leaks, null pointer dereferences, and unused variables.
  • Lightweight and easy to integrate into CI.
• Clang-Tidy
  • Part of LLVM/Clang toolchain.
  • Provides checks for C++ core guidelines, modern C++ practices, and security rules.
  • Highly configurable with .clang-tidy configuration files.
  • Supports auto-fixes for many issues.

Tools for Python Analysis

• Pylint
  • Comprehensive Python linter.
  • Enforces PEP8 coding style.
  • Detects potential runtime errors (e.g., undefined variables, bad imports).
• Flake8
  • Lightweight linter focusing on style and simplicity.
  • Often used alongside Black (auto-formatter).
• Bandit
  • Security-focused static analyzer.
  • Detects common security issues in Python (e.g., hardcoded passwords, use of eval(), weak cryptography).

Tools for Bash Scripts Analysis

• ShellCheck → Detects syntax errors, bad practices, unsafe constructs; gives explanations and fixes.
• shfmt → Formats scripts consistently; enforces readability and reduces subtle style bugs.
• bashate → Checks scripts against style guidelines; useful for team-wide consistency.
• checkbashisms → Flags Bash-specific features that break POSIX portability.
• SonarQube (plugin) → Adds Bash rules to broader SAST; catches insecure commands and hardcoded secrets.

Multi-Language and Security-Focused Tool

SonarQube

• Commercial/open-source platform supporting many languages (C++, Python, Java, etc.).
• Provides security rules, code smells, and technical debt tracking.
• Can run locally or via Jenkins plugin.
• Provides dashboards for team-wide visibility.

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

CLI Execution

• Run linters and analyzers as part of a dedicated pipeline stage.
• Example for C++:

1 cppcheck --enable=all --xml . 2> cppcheck-report.xml
2 clang-tidy src/**/*.cpp -- -Iinclude > clang-tidy-report.txt
3

• Example for Python:

1 pylint src/**/*.py > pylint-report.txt
2 bandit -r src/ -f json -o bandit-report.json
3 

Jenkins Plugins

• Warnings Next Generation Plugin: parse reports from Cppcheck, Clang-Tidy, Pylint, Flake8.
• SonarQube Jenkins Plugin: trigger scans and publish results to SonarQube server.

Best Practices

• Fail builds only for critical/high-severity issues to avoid “noise fatigue.”
• Run fast linters (like Flake8, Cppcheck basic mode) on every PR.
• Run deep scans (Clang-Tidy full analysis, SonarQube) nightly or on merge to main.
• Store reports as Jenkins artifacts for traceability.

Coverity Checks

Why Coverity?

While open-source static analyzers are useful, enterprise projects often require industry-grade tools to:

• Detect critical defects that lightweight tools may miss.
• Provide deep semantic analysis across large codebases.
• Integrate with compliance and safety workflows (ISO 26262, DO-178C, MISRA, etc.).

Coverity (by Perforce) is one of the leading static analysis solutions used in safety- and security-critical industries. It is especially valuable for large C++ and Python repositories with complex build systems (like packman, premake, bazel).

What Coverity Detects

Coverity analyzes source code without running it, identifying:

• Memory errors: leaks, double frees, null pointer dereferences.
• Concurrency issues: race conditions, deadlocks, improper synchronization.
• API misuse: incorrect function usage, invalid parameters.
• Resource leaks: file descriptors, sockets, database connections not released.
• Security vulnerabilities: buffer overflows, SQL injection, command injection.
• Undefined behavior: out-of-bounds access, use-after-free.

It goes beyond simple linting by building a whole-program model to trace execution paths across files, libraries, and modules.

Coverity Workflow

Typical Coverity workflow in CI/CD:

1. Capture:
   • Build the project with the Coverity Build Tool (cov-build).
   • This captures the full compilation database (similar to Clang compilation DB).
   • Example:
     1 cov-build --dir cov-int make all
2. Analysis:
   • Run Coverity analyzer on the captured data.
     1 cov-analyze --dir cov-int --all
3. Report & Upload:
   • Generate reports or upload results to the Coverity Connect server.
     1 cov-commit-defects --dir cov-int --stream my_project --host coverity-server --port 8080 --user dev --password ****

Jenkins Integration

Perforce provides official Jenkins plugins for Coverity:

• Coverity on Polaris Plugin
  • Integrates with Perforce Polaris SaaS platform.
  • Runs scans as part of Jenkins pipelines.
  • Provides defect dashboards and trend reports.
• Coverity Plugin (on-premise)
  • Runs cov-build and cov-analyze as Jenkins build steps.
  • Publishes results directly to Coverity Connect server.
  • Provides trend graphs and defect gating (block build if critical defects found).

Dashboard & Reporting

• Coverity provides a web dashboard (Coverity Connect) with:
  • Defect details (file, line, description, CWE classification).
  • Prioritization by severity, impact, and confidence.
  • History tracking of newly introduced vs resolved defects.
• Reports can be exported to PDF, JSON, or integrated into Jira for tracking.

Best Practices

• Baseline once: Start with a full-project scan and mark existing issues as “legacy” or “triaged.”
• Block on new issues: Configure Jenkins to fail builds only for newly introduced high/critical defects.
• Nightly deep scans: Run full Coverity scans nightly; run incremental scans on each commit/PR.
• Developer feedback: Integrate Coverity results into IDEs (Visual Studio, Eclipse, VS Code) for faster fixes.

Dynamic Code Analysis & Runtime Security

Why Dynamic Analysis?

Static analysis is powerful, but some vulnerabilities only appear when code is executed. Dynamic analysis focuses on testing software at runtime, uncovering:

• Memory issues: leaks, use-after-free, invalid accesses.
• Concurrency bugs: race conditions, deadlocks, data races.
• Input handling flaws: crashes, buffer overflows, unexpected exceptions.
• Security weaknesses: exploitable behavior under unusual or malicious input.

This type of testing complements static analysis and ensures code behaves securely and reliably under real-world conditions.

Tools for Dynamic Analysis

• Valgrind
  • Classic runtime analysis tool for C/C++.
  • Detects memory leaks, invalid reads/writes, race conditions.
  • Slower than sanitizer-based approaches, but very thorough.
• Sanitizers (LLVM/GCC built-ins)
  • AddressSanitizer (ASan): Detects memory errors (out-of-bounds, use-after-free).
  • ThreadSanitizer (TSan): Detects data races and threading issues.
  • MemorySanitizer (MSan): Detects uninitialized memory usage.
  • UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer (UBSan): Detects undefined C/C++ operations.
  • Typically faster than Valgrind and well-suited for CI pipelines.
• Fuzz Testing
  • Automatically generates large volumes of random or malformed inputs to uncover crashes and vulnerabilities.
  • AFL (American Fuzzy Lop): Classic fuzzing engine for binaries.
  • libFuzzer: In-process, coverage-guided fuzzer integrated with Clang/LLVM.
  • OSS-Fuzz: Google-hosted fuzzing for open-source projects.
  • Particularly useful for parsers, protocols, and input-heavy modules.
• Hypothesis (Python)
  • Property-based testing framework.
  • Automatically generates test cases to explore edge conditions.
  • Great for testing APIs, data validation, and algorithm robustness.

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

Dynamic analysis should be part of the test execution stage in Jenkins pipelines:

• Memory & Concurrency Checks
  • Compile with sanitizers enabled (e.g., -fsanitize=address for ASan).
  • Run unit and integration tests under Valgrind or sanitizers.
  • Collect logs and publish reports as Jenkins artifacts.
• Fuzzing
  • Run fuzzers in dedicated pipeline jobs.
  • For PR checks: limit fuzzing time (e.g., 1–5 minutes).
  • For nightly builds: allow extended fuzzing campaigns.
  • Fail builds on crashes or memory errors detected.
• Python Testing
  • Add Hypothesis-based property tests into the test suite.
  • Run them as part of regular unit test execution.

Example Jenkins pipeline stage (C++ with ASan):

stage('Dynamic Analysis') {
    steps {
        sh 'cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-fsanitize=address,undefined" ..'
        sh 'make -j4'
        sh './tests --gtest_output=xml:asan-report.xml'
    }
    post {
        always {
            junit 'asan-report.xml'
        }
    }
}

Best Practices

• Use sanitizers for every PR/MR – they are fast and catch critical issues.
• Reserve Valgrind and fuzzing for longer CI jobs (nightly/weekly).
• Run fuzzers with corpus saving (keep crashing inputs for regression testing).
• Combine Hypothesis with unit tests to strengthen Python test coverage.
• Store logs and crash artifacts in Jenkins for debugging.

Commit Message & Source Code Conventions

Why Commit & Code Conventions Matter

Consistent conventions are not just about aesthetics — they directly improve:

• Readability: Clean, uniform code is easier to review and maintain.
• Traceability: Standardized commit messages improve history navigation, release notes, and changelog generation.
• Automation: Many CI/CD tools and changelog generators rely on structured commit messages.
• Team alignment: Everyone follows the same rules, avoiding subjective debates on style.

Without conventions, repositories become harder to maintain, and onboarding new developers takes longer.

Tools for Commit Message Conventions

• commitlint
  • Enforces commit message rules.
  • Typically used with the Conventional Commits specification.
  • Example rule: feat: add new login API (type: scope: description).
• Conventional Commits standard
  • Defines a human- and machine-readable commit format.
  • Examples:
    • feat(auth): add OAuth2 login
    • fix(parser): handle null input
    • docs: update README with new instructions
  • Enables automatic changelog generation and semantic versioning.

Tools for Source Code Conventions

• pre-commit framework
  • General-purpose framework for running checks before commits.
  • Can run linters, secret scanners, formatters, etc.
  • Central configuration (.pre-commit-config.yaml) ensures consistency across all developers.
• clang-format (C++)
  • Auto-formats C++ code according to predefined style (Google, LLVM, Mozilla, custom).
  • Eliminates style discussions by letting the tool decide.
• black (Python)
  • “The uncompromising Python code formatter.”
  • Opinionated but guarantees consistent formatting.
  • Works well alongside flake8 for style enforcement.

Integration Into Workflow

Developer-side (Git hooks)

• Use pre-commit framework to enforce formatting and commit rules before changes are pushed.
• Prevents bad commits from entering the repo.
• Example setup in .pre-commit-config.yaml:

1 repos:
2  - repo: https://github.com/commitlint/commitlint
3     rev: v17.0.0
4     hooks:
5      - id: commitlint
6  - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-clang-format
7    rev: v14.0.6
8    hooks:
9      - id: clang-format
10  - repo: https://github.com/psf/black
11    rev: 22.3.0
12    hooks:
13      - id: black
14

CI-side (Jenkins validation)

• Add a Jenkins stage for formatting & commit message checks.
• Example pipeline steps:

1 stage('Conventions') {
2    steps {
3        sh 'commitlint --from=origin/main'
4        sh 'clang-format --Werror --dry-run $(find src -name "*.cpp")'
5        sh 'black --check src/'
6    }
7 }
8

• Fail the build if conventions are violated.

Best Practices

• Run auto-formatters (clang-format, black) locally before commits.
• Use commitlint in both pre-commit hooks and Jenkins pipelines.
• Educate developers on Conventional Commits to ensure semantic meaning in commit history.
• Provide a .editorconfig file to align IDE settings across the team.

Build System & Config Verification

Why Build & Config Verification Matters

Your build system and configuration files are just as critical as the source code itself. Weaknesses here can introduce:

• Reproducibility issues → builds differ between machines or environments.
• Security risks → pulling dependencies from untrusted sources.
• Policy violations → usage of banned dependencies, incorrect flags, or unsafe defaults.
• Pipeline instability → unnoticed config drift or misconfigurations.

Ensuring that packman, premake, and bazel build definitions are properly validated helps maintain both security and stability across all environments.

Tools for Build & Config Verification

• bazel audit
  • Built-in tool for analyzing dependencies in Bazel projects.
  • Example: bazel query --output=build //... can list all dependencies.
  • Helps detect unnecessary, duplicated, or external dependencies.
  • Can be extended with rules to enforce trusted sources only.
• conftest (based on OPA – Open Policy Agent)
  • Policy-as-code tool for validating configuration files (JSON, YAML, HCL, etc.).
  • Can be used to enforce custom rules, e.g.:
    • Only allow dependencies from approved repositories.
    • Prevent debug flags or insecure compiler options.
  • Works well for validating packman, premake, and CI configuration files.
• Checkov
  • Focused on Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning.
  • Detects security and compliance issues in Terraform, Kubernetes manifests, Dockerfiles, etc.
  • Useful if your repositories also contain deployment or cloud-related config files.

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

• Config linting stage
  Add a dedicated pipeline stage for configuration and build-system validation.

Example (Bazel & conftest):

1 stage('Config Verification') {
2     steps {
3         sh 'bazel query //... > bazel-deps.txt'
4         sh 'conftest test premake5.lua'
5         sh 'conftest test packman.yaml'
6         sh 'checkov -d ./infrastructure'
7     }
8

• Fail builds on policy violations
  • Reject unapproved external repositories.
  • Reject insecure compiler/linker flags.
  • Reject unscanned or unsigned dependencies.
• Reporting
  • Store reports as artifacts in Jenkins.
  • Send Slack/email notifications if high-severity violations are found.

Best Practices

• Define organization-wide rules for dependencies and compiler settings.
• Require reproducible builds by pinning dependency versions in packman/premake/bazel.
• Periodically run bazel audit and dependency checks to prevent config drift.
• Extend conftest policies as your security and compliance requirements evolve.

License & Compliance Checking

Why License Compliance Matters

Using third-party and open-source software accelerates development, but it also introduces legal and compliance risks.

Key challenges:

• License incompatibility → combining libraries with conflicting licenses (e.g., GPL with proprietary code).
• Unapproved licenses → using software under licenses that your company does not permit.
• Obligations → certain licenses require attribution, disclosure of modifications, or even releasing source code.
• Audits & reputation risk → non-compliance can result in legal disputes, forced code disclosure, or damage to reputation.

By automating license and compliance checks, you ensure that every dependency aligns with organizational policies.

Tools for License & Compliance Checks

• FOSSA
  • Cloud-based/commercial solution.
  • Detects license issues, vulnerabilities, and policy violations in dependencies.
  • Supports automatic attribution reports.
  • Integrates with Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab.
• Black Duck (Synopsys)
  • Enterprise-grade compliance & security scanner.
  • Builds a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and checks for risky licenses.
  • Already used in many regulated industries.
  • Integrates into Jenkins with the Black Duck plugin.
• Licensee
  • Open-source tool (Ruby-based, used by GitHub).
  • Detects licenses in repositories.
  • Simple and lightweight, but less feature-rich than enterprise tools.
• OSS Review Toolkit (ORT)
  • Open-source, full-featured toolkit for license compliance.
  • Can scan dependencies, analyze licenses, and enforce policies.
  • Supports SBOM generation (SPDX, CycloneDX).
  • Good alternative if you want an open-source solution closer to Black Duck/FOSSA.

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

• Pipeline stage for license scanning
  Add a dedicated stage after dependency resolution.

Example (Black Duck & ORT):

1 stage('License Compliance') {
2     steps {
3         sh 'blackduck scan --output bd-report.json'
4         sh 'ort scan --dir . --output-dir ort-results'
5     }
6     post {
7         always {
8             archiveArtifacts artifacts: '**/*report*.json', fingerprint: true
9         }
10     }
11 }
12

• Policy enforcement
  • Fail the build if disallowed licenses (e.g., GPL, AGPL) are detected.
  • Warn on licenses requiring attribution and generate compliance reports automatically.
  • Export SBOMs for auditing.

Best Practices

• Maintain an allowlist and blocklist of licenses in policy files (e.g., MIT, BSD allowed; GPL, AGPL restricted).
• Generate SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials) for every release.
• Run license scans on every PR/MR and periodically across the repo.
• Store compliance reports in Jenkins artifacts or a central compliance portal.
• Pair license scanning with CVE scanning (covered earlier) for a full view of legal and security risks.

English Verification (Docs, Commit Messages, Readme)

Why English Verification Matters

Clear and professional communication in repositories is just as important as secure and clean code. Poorly written documentation, commit messages, or README files can lead to:

• Misunderstandings between developers, reviewers, and customers.
• Lower project credibility when code is shared externally.
• Maintenance challenges since unclear commit messages and docs make debugging harder.

Automating English verification ensures consistency, readability, and professionalism across all developer-facing artifacts.

Tools for English Verification

• Vale
  • Linter for prose (like ESLint, but for text).
  • Supports custom rulesets for enforcing style guides (e.g., Microsoft Writing Style Guide, Google Developer Style Guide).
  • Great for .md docs, technical content, and READMEs.
• LanguageTool
  • Open-source grammar, spelling, and style checker.
  • Supports multiple languages and integrates well into pipelines.
  • Can be run as a CLI tool in Jenkins to check commit messages and documentation.

Integration Into Jenkins Pipelines

Docs & Readme checks
Run Vale and LanguageTool against .md, .txt, .rst, or .adoc files.

Example:

1 stage('English Verification - Docs') {
3     steps {
4         sh 'vale docs/'
5         sh 'languagetool -l en-US README.md'
6     }
7 }
8 

Commit message checks

• Extract commit messages in the pipeline.
• Pass them through Vale or LanguageTool.
• Fail builds if grammar/style issues exceed a defined threshold.

Example:

1 stage('English Verification - Commits') {
2     steps {
3         sh 'git log -1 --pretty=%B > commit-msg.txt'
4         sh 'vale commit-msg.txt'
5     }
6 }

Best Practices

• Define a style guide (e.g., “use imperative mood in commit messages” like Conventional Commits).
• Use pre-commit hooks for developers to run Vale/LanguageTool locally.
• Focus on critical files: README.md, docs, commit messages, PR/MR descriptions.
• Keep rules lightweight to avoid blocking builds for minor stylistic issues.
• Use Jenkins to warn on style violations and fail only on critical clarity issues.

AI-based Code Review Assistants

Why AI in Code Reviews?

Traditional static/dynamic analyzers catch many issues, but they are often rule-based and may miss context-specific problems. AI-based assistants go further by:

• Understanding the intent behind the code.
• Detecting subtle bugs that traditional linters might miss.
• Suggesting performance or readability improvements.
• Enforcing internal coding guidelines automatically.
• Reducing reviewer workload by automating routine checks.

AI does not replace human reviewers but augments them — freeing engineers to focus on architecture, design, and complex logic.

Tools for AI-based Code Review

CodeRabbit

• Fully supports both GitLab and self-managed GitLab environments.
• Offers automated AI-powered reviews, inline comments, and interactive bot feedback directly within Merge Requests. Set up via Personal Access Token or Group Access Token for GitLab integration.
• Both cloud-hosted and on-prem deployment options are available, with dedicated bots and webhook configuration for seamless integration.
• Community feedback confirms the support for GitLab:
• “CodeRabbit (AI Powered Code Reviewer) is now available for GitLab Merge Requests” (source: Reddit)

Amazon CodeWhisperer via AWS CodeStar Connections

• Supports GitLab (both SaaS and self-managed) through AWS CodeStar Connections, allowing integration into GitLab-hosted repositories.
• Enables customized AI code suggestions and can act as a reviewer in CI pipelines — triggered through your AWS-connected workflow.

GitLab Duo with Amazon Q

• A native AI service built into GitLab for code suggestions, vulnerability detection, unit test generation, and MR quality insights.
• Requires GitLab Ultimate and setup with Amazon Q/AWS services. Features include smart refactoring, vulnerability explanations, and merge request assistance.

Integration Into Workflow

• PR/MR Hooks
  • Run AI code review bots on every PR/MR.
  • Provide inline comments automatically.
  • Optionally block merges if severe issues are found.
• Jenkins Pipeline (Optional)
  • Trigger AI review tools via CLI or API after build/test stages.
  • Store AI-generated reports as artifacts for traceability.

Example:

1 stage('AI Code Review') {
2     steps {
3         sh 'coderabbit scan --pr $CHANGE_ID --repo .'
4     }
5 }
6

Best Practices

• Use AI review tools as advisors, not absolute gatekeepers.
• Combine with human code reviews for balanced oversight.
• Tune AI tools to align with internal coding standards (naming, architecture, security rules).
• Monitor false positives and retrain/update rules where possible.
• Pair AI review with English Verification (commit messages, docs) for holistic feedback.

Putting It All Together, KPIs

1. Gather list of used repositories in all used projects.
   • Divide them into three groups:
   • Open Source Software - OSS
   • OSS stored internally
2. Internally prepared repositories
3. Prepare CI improvements for all repos kept internally
   • Secret scanning
   • Dependency scanning (CVE)
   • Static analyzers
   • Coverity
   • Dynamic testing
   • Commit message & style checks
   • License/compliance
   • Documentation & English verification
   • AI-based MR checkers